The Cultural Context Of Ephesians 5:18-6:9 -- By: Gordon D. Fee

Journal: Priscilla Papers
Volume: PP 31:4 (Autumn 2017)
Article: The Cultural Context Of Ephesians 5:18-6:9
Author: Gordon D. Fee


The Cultural Context Of Ephesians 5:18-6:9

Gordon D. Fee

Winter 2002

Gordon Fee is an ordained minister of the Assemblies of God (USA) and is Professor Emeritus of New Testament Studies at Regent College in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. He has written numerous articles and books and served as contributing editor of Discovering Biblical Equality: Complementarity without Hierarchy (InterVarsity, 2004, 2005). He taught previously at Wheaton College and Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary. Dr. Fee serves on CBE International’s Board of Reference.

I begin this discourse with a disclaimer, since the title suggests far more than one can deliver in a limited amount of space. It suggests far more knowledge about this topic than I actually have—indeed, it is safe to say that there is much more that we don’t know about these things than we actually do. What I hope to do is to offer a few probings into the cultural background of this passage—which has become such a crux for people on both sides of the issue of whether there is a divinely ordained hierarchy in the life of the church and home, based on gender alone.

I. Preliminary Matters

There are some preliminary matters that are important for our understanding of the passage itself.

1. Some assumptions about Ephesians itself and the role of this passage in this letter. Contrary to what is probably the majority opinion in current New Testament scholarship, I think the Ephesian letter is by Paul. Furthermore, I think the letter has to be kept in its historical context as a companion letter with Colossians and Philemon.

The letter was probably not written specifically to the church in Ephesus—some early manuscripts lack a name in 1:1; in 1:15 Paul speaks about only having heard about their faith, and there are no personal words whatsoever. It may have been either the letter to Laodicea that ended up in Ephesus, or—more likely, in my opinion—this was a circular letter to the many churches in the province of Asia that sprang out of what he had to say to the Colossians.

What is important for our purposes is the letter’s clear association with Colossians and, therefore, with Philemon. One of the unfortunate things that happened in the organizing of the Christian canon was the separation of Philemon from Colossians, for both letters would have been read together in Philemon’s house church, with both Philemon and Onesimus present. The point, of course, is that the so-called house rules that occur only in Colossians and Ephesians almost certainly spring from the circumstances that brought Onesimus back to P...

You must have a subscription and be logged in to read the entire article.
Click here to subscribe
visitor : : uid: ()