Periodical Reviews -- By: Jefferson P. Webster
Journal: Bibliotheca Sacra
Volume: BSAC 171:681 (Jan 2014)
Article: Periodical Reviews
Author: Jefferson P. Webster
BSac 171:681 (January-March 2014) p. 104
Periodical Reviews
By The Faculty and Library Staff of Dallas Theological Seminary
Editor
“A New Perspective on the New Perspective,” J. D. G. Dunn, Early Christianity
Despite being around for decades, the so-called new perspective on Paul (NPP) remains misunderstood and an object of serious debate. Many who are considered part of this movement have significant differences with others who are also so labeled. To use “NPP” in this review is convenient but not intended to imply that this is a unified school or movement. Given this diversity, there is no one better to summarize many of its most important contributions than James Dunn, a prolific writer within this perspective and the scholar who coined the label “new perspective on Paul” in his
Dunn’s article focuses on the “new perspective on justification by faith,” which is timely in light of recent debates on this issue, seen most notably in the dialogue between John Piper and N. T. Wright (respectively, The Future of Justification, Crossway,
Dunn begins by arguing that the NPP’s teaching on justification is not really new at all (p. 157). He states, “It is ‘new’ because the dimension of Paul’s teaching which it highlights has been largely lost to sight in more contemporary expositions, even though it was so central to Paul’s own formulation of the doctrine. It is ‘new’ because it gives a renewed emphasis to aspects of the historical situation, which were fundamental to that formulation and which should remain fundamental for our understanding of Paul’s gospel for today” (p. 157). Dunn argues that the NPP “does not pretend or think or want to replace all elements of the ‘old perspective’ ” (p. 157). This is an important point and not often understood by those with only minimal exposure to the debate. Dunn notes that “it is not necessary for the ‘new perspective’ to call into question what have traditionally been taken to be the central emphases of Paul’s doctrine” (pp. 157-58). Acceptance
You must have a subscription and be logged in to read the entire article.
Click here to subscribe