Journal: Global Journal of Classical Theology
Volume: GJCT 20:2 (Dec 2023)
Article: A Diversity Of Failures: A Critical Evaluation Of Subordinationist Interpretations Of Hebrews 1:10–12
Author: Michael R. Burgos

A Diversity Of Failures: A Critical Evaluation Of Subordinationist Interpretations Of Hebrews 1:10–12

Michael R. Burgos

Ph.D., Forge Theological Seminary; D.Min. candidate; The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary Pastor of Northwest Hills Community Church, Torrington, CT, USA

Abstract: The application of Psalm 102:25–27 at Hebrews 1:10–12 has historically been viewed as conclusively proof of trinitarian Christology as it attributes the name of God (i.e., Lord/Yahweh), the acts of creation and consummation, eternality, and divine immutability to the Son of God and this according to the testimony of the Father. Non-trinitarian writers have construed a variety of interpretations that comport with subordinationism. This study identifies these various interpretations and demonstrates through consistent biblical exegesis, that the subordinationist explanations rely upon erroneous methods, assumptions, and conclusions.

Keywords: Hebrews 1, Psalm 102, Christology, Subordinationism, Non-trinitarianism, Biblical Studies, New Testament

Introduction

Psalm 102 contrasts the fleeting nature of the psalmist’s life (v. 3, 11) and circumstances (vv. 6–9) and the unchanging and eternal nature of Israel’s covenant God (vv. 12, 24–27). Whereas the psalmist endures the physical afflictions of this life (vv. 3–5) and the sufferings brought about by his enemies (v. 8), Yahweh remains upon his throne forever (v. 12). The psalmist attributes his circumstances to the sovereign providence of God (v. 10) and places his trust in Yahweh who will graciously restore his people and become the object of worship for all generations (vv. 12, 18).

The only direct NT quotation of Psalm 102 occurs within the prologue of the Epistle of Hebrews (1:1–14). There, an argument is presented by the writer for the preeminence of the Son of God over and against OT prophets (v. 1–2