Universal Sin And Salvation In Romans 5:12-21 -- By: Mark Rapinchuk
JETS 42:3 (September 1999) p. 427
Universal Sin And Salvation In Romans 5:12-21
One of the more prominent doctrines in systematic theology is the doctrine of “inherited sin.” 1 A great deal of speculation has taken place regarding the cause, transmission/imputation and consequences of inherited sin. It is commonplace to cite Rom 5:12–21 as the foundational text for this doctrine. 2 The present essay intends to question this standard practice. It is granted that several related issues of systematic theology will surface, which cannot be adequately addressed within the confines of this article. The focus will rather be one important exegetical issue involved in the common reading of Romans 5, namely, what does Paul mean by εἰς πάντας ἀνθρώπους?
In reading the provocative words of Paul found in Rom 5:12–21 (especially vv. 12, 18–19), one cannot help but wonder if the standard reading of this section reads too much into the passage. Have interpreters gone off the path by reading this as an exposition on the concept of original or inherited sin? Not only might one question whether this is Paul’s intention and main point, it might be asked if this concept is in view at all. The following essay suggest that such an understanding leads to unacceptable conclusions. If the present passage is read as an explicit statement about inherited sin (on the basis of 5:12, 18), then consistency would seem to require that it also be read as an explicit statement of Universalism. 3 If Paul says in v. 18 that all without exception are sinners (as a direct consequence of Adam’s sin), then he is also maintaining that all without exception are saved from their sin.
But this, we maintain, is mistaken on two counts. First, it is not Paul’s intention to speculate on the transmission or imputation of human sinfulness. 4
* Mark Rapinchuk is assistant professor of philosophy and religion at the College of the Ozarks in Point Lookout, MO 65726.
JETS 42:3 (September 1999) p. 428
His point is related, but significantly different. Second, a misplaced emphasis on this alleged speculat...
Click here to subscribe